How Much do you "Photoshop"? (Piccadilly Circus, London)
One of the questions I get asked most is "do you photoshop your photos?"
I got the question again today, so decided to show an example of how much "photoshop" I use. The full blog post covers my processing stages, with a sample of the image at the end of each.
Apart from a handful of exceptions, the images that you see in my iStock portfolio aren't the product of photoshop being used to replace skies or add elements, but a real-life scene with bright, vivid colors.
This image took a lot of time in post processing, although that doesn't mean its really been edited to significantly alter its appearance. The main changes are:
- a contrast boost in raw development
- adjustment of the colours and white balance
- removing trademarks and logos
Stage 1: What comes out of the Camera
Seeing as I always shoot in raw format, I don't actually have a "photo" that comes out of the camera. Instead there is a digital file that needs to be interpreted by another piece of software. Each RAW converter has its own defaults for how it interprets a camera's files, so what you will get out of Lightroom will differ from Aperture (for example). In a sense its meaningless to compare this sort of default, because the software is designed to allow you to make adjustments that meet your needs or preferences. Image 1 is however my raw "default".
More important is of course what goes into the camera. Seeing as this post is about photoshop, I'll save that for when i start my blog series on "Travel Photography for Beginners" which will start next Friday. In short this photo was taken with a Panasonic GF1, an Olympus 9-18mm lens and a Gorrillapod attached to a lightpole for stability.
The default parameters for many raw converters can be a lot less "punchy" or saturated, particularly than many out-of-camera jpgs. Often with vivid conditions you'll also find that images are flatter than what you see in real life. So while there is a noticeable difference between the first and second image, its actually bigger than it would be if I had a Panasonic GF1 jpg to compare it to (but I only shoot raw, so I don't!
Stage 2: RAW Development
The main raw adjustments were to: reduce the sharpening, increase the contrast, remove minor chromatic aberration (only visible at full-size) and to adjust the white-balance slightly. As a result, blacks are a little blacker, there's overall less yellow in the image, and colors are a little punchier.
Stage 3: "Photoshop"
My use for Photoshop is usually only to remove logos, trademarks, number-plates and identifiable material so that it meets iStock's strict upload requirements. If you're familiar with Piccadilly Circus in London, you'll be aware that there are a lot of signs! At night, neon signs bleed light into their surroundings, so removing them all ended up being a big job! The final image can also be seen at iStock.
So, how much do I photoshop? About this much!




How do you remove objects?
I've seen (and been impressed with) Photoshop's new Intelligent Fill option. What is your preferred method of removing/erasing objects such as the flag or neon signs in your post?
Cloning mainly
The content aware fill can be impressive, particularly when you're dealing with areas such as sky where there are transitional gradients, but for most detail work the slow process of cloning is still the most reliable!
Post new comment